Why Scholarly Sources?
Remember that "scholarly sources" have gone through the process of peer review; in other words, they're written by scholars or other experts and have been approved/validated by other experts in the same field of knowledge.
What's included?
*Access to education literature and research dating back to 1966
What's included?
*Citations and full-text to resources relating to multiple subject areas
*Access to articles in the journal Science from 1990 to the present
What's included?
*Full-text to academic journals and primary sources in multiple disciplines
What's included?
*Citations to resources related to the social and behavioral sciences
Why Popular Sources?
Popular sources range from journalism published in newspapers, magazines, or online news sites (which is often high-quality and thoroughly researched/vetted, but is not peer-reviewed) to personal websites, blogs, and social media posts. Any/all of these types of popular sources will be relevant for this assignment, but think carefully about your decision-making process as you figure out which popular sources to include.
In this assignment, you might use popular sources to:
One Database to Try:
What's included?
*Citations and full-text to resources relating to multiple subject areas
*Access to articles in the journal Science from 1990 to the present
Websites, Blogs, Social Media posts, etc.
When you're using Google to find other internet sources, it becomes mandatory that you think critically about what you're seeing and why. Use the CRAAP test (described below) or whatever metric works for you, but be consistent and be strict! Don't let a source "slide by" just because you like it - be ready to explain why you've chosen every source and be sure that you can explain the authority of its author(s) and any bias that it may have.
The "CRAAP test" gives you a handy acronym to remember important aspects of a source as you're considering how you might use it in your paper:
C: Currency - When was the source written? Is timeliness relevant to its usefulness?
R: Relevance - How does the source align with the arguments you're constructing in your paper?
A: Accuracy - Can you trust the information in the source? How do you know?
A: Authority - Who wrote it? What gives them the authority to write about this topic?
P: Purpose - For whom was the source written? Does it seem to have an agenda or bias? If so, how will you address it?
Remember that none of these criteria is black and white! There are shades of grey in all of them.
Consider "authority." We know from our earlier conversations that scholars have authority by virtue of their education level, and that their writings undergo the peer-review process (which grants even more scholarly authority upon a text). But, for example, a person of color (regardless of education level) holds a different kind of authority on the topic of racism than a white sociologist who studies racism academically. Both can be authorities on the subject: the person of color's lived experience grants authority, as does the scholarship of the white sociologist. Each is valid and important, but they are different. Keep these things in mind as you're engaging with your sources, and your research (and therefore, your writing!) will be more nuanced and meaningful.
